CROSS-TEAM HEATMAPPRO
Your Platform team has great testing.
Your Payments team doesn't.
50 standards. Every team. One grid. Red cells jump off the page — you see the gaps you can't find in standups.
Patterns you can't see from standups
Cross-team inconsistency
One team scores 4.2 on testing, another 1.6. Same org, same standards, different reality. The heatmap makes this impossible to miss.
Phase-level gaps
Development practices are strong across the board, but Operations is red everywhere. That's an org-level problem, not a team problem.
Hidden strengths
Your newest team has the best release practices. The heatmap reveals who to learn from — not just who needs help.
Standards drill-down
Click any cell to see individual standard scores. "Testing 2.4" breaks down to: unit tests 3.2, integration tests 1.1, security testing 2.8.
Maturity color coding
Red (1.0–2.0), amber (2.0–3.0), yellow-green (3.0–4.0), green (4.0–5.0). Patterns emerge from color alone — no numbers needed.
Team × standard matrix
50 standards × N teams in one scrollable grid. The density is the point — you see everything, not a filtered summary.
When you open the heatmap
New team joins the org
Where does the acquired team stand versus your existing baseline? The heatmap shows gaps in the first scan.
Before quarterly planning
"We should invest in testing." The heatmap proves it with data — or shows that operations is actually the bigger gap.
After a production incident
Was this a team-specific gap or an org-wide blindspot? If every team is red on monitoring, it's a systemic issue.
Built for engineering managers with 2+ teams
Engineering managers and directors who suspect inconsistency across teams but can't prove it. The heatmap replaces the feeling that "something is off with that team" with a color-coded grid that tells you exactly what and where. No more waiting for incidents to reveal gaps.
See every gap.
Across every team.
Cross-Team Heatmap is included with Concordance Pro alongside Overview, Trends, and Signal.
See Pricing →